35x11.50R17 — matching a metric width but not its height
Two tires that would look alike from the front and are nothing alike on a speedometer.
Flotation (imperial) notation · Flotation (imperial)
- Overall diameter
- 35.00 in
- 889 mm
- Section width
- 11.50 in
- 292 mm
- Sidewall height
- 9.00 in
- 229 mm
- Aspect ratio
- 78.3%
- sidewall as a share of width
- Wheel diameter
- 17 in
- the hole in the middle
- Circumference
- 110.0 in
- 2793 mm
- Revolutions per mile
- 576.2
- geometric, not measured
- Revolutions per km
- 358.1
- geometric, not measured
- Typical load index
- 108–128
- 2205–3968 lb per tire
Flotation sizes are almost always LT construction, so they share the light-truck band. Speed symbols run low because the aggressive tread patterns these sizes are sold in are rated against heat build-up, not against sustained high speed.
The load-index range shown is the band this CLASS of size is typically produced in — not a list of what is in stock for this exact size today. Load index and speed symbol are printed on the sidewall of the specific tire you are holding, and the required minimum is on the placard of the specific vehicle you are fitting. Read both.
Nearest real sizes in metric notation, same wheel
- 315/70R1734.36 in tall-0.64 in
- 305/70R1733.81 in tall-1.19 in
- 295/70R1733.26 in tall-1.74 in
Compare any two sizes, including ones this site has no page for, in the comparison tool.
Nothing in the vehicle records here lists 35x11.50R17. It is the narrow member of the 35-inch group on a 17-inch wheel, and it exists for arches that will take the height but not the full 12.50 in.
Width matched, height not
| 35x11.50R17 | 295/70R17 | |
|---|---|---|
| Section width | 11.50 in | 11.61 in |
| Overall diameter | 35.00 in | 33.26 in |
| Sidewall | 9.00 in | 8.13 in |
| Revolutions per mile | 576.2 | 606.4 |
Eleven hundredths of an inch of width and 1.74 in of height. From directly in front of the vehicle these two tires present almost identically; on the road one turns thirty times more per mile than the other.
That pairing is a useful corrective to judging a fitment by appearance. Section width is what the eye reads and overall diameter is what every instrument reads, and the two are set independently by different numbers in the code.
The case where both do line up is worth naming too. 295/65R20 measures 35.10 in on 11.61 in — a tenth of an inch taller than this size and eleven hundredths wider — on a wheel three inches larger. Those two are as close to the same tire as any cross-notation pair here, and the difference is almost entirely casing depth: 9.00 in here against 7.55 in there.
The other 35 on this wheel
35x12.50R17 stands the same 35.00 in on 12.50 in of section — 1.00 in wider, and indistinguishable from this size to anything that counts wheel revolutions. Both roll 110.0 in per turn and 576.2 turns per mile. The two are set against each other in a direct comparison.
Choosing between them is a pure width decision with nothing else attached, which is rarer than it sounds: almost every other pair of sizes in this catalogue moves at least two dimensions at once.
Coming up from the 33s and the 34
- 33x10.50R17 — 33.00 in, 2.00 in below, 1.00 in narrower
- 33x12.50R17 — 33.00 in, 2.00 in below, 1.00 in wider
- 34x10.50R17 — 34.00 in, 1.00 in below, 1.00 in narrower
- 315/70R17 — 34.36 in, 0.64 in below, 0.90 in wider
The last row is the closest approach in height and it goes the other way on width, which is the recurring shape of the 17-inch band: nothing gets nearer than about half an inch without also changing stance. This size is also compared with the widest metric alternative in the 305/70R17 pairing.
Related
- 305/70R17 vs 35x11.50R17
- 35x11.50R17 vs 35x12.50R17
- 315/70R1734.36 in tall
- 305/70R1733.81 in tall
- 295/70R1733.26 in tall
Class: Flotation (imperial). Every figure above is computed from the size code, not stored — see how these numbers are calculated.