235/65R17 tire size — one rung of a five-step ladder
The most evenly spaced family in the catalogue, and this is the second rung of it.
Metric notation · Passenger touring
- Overall diameter
- 29.03 in
- 737 mm
- Section width
- 9.25 in
- 235 mm
- Sidewall height
- 6.01 in
- 153 mm
- Aspect ratio
- 65%
- sidewall as a share of width
- Wheel diameter
- 17 in
- the hole in the middle
- Circumference
- 91.2 in
- 2316 mm
- Revolutions per mile
- 694.8
- geometric, not measured
- Revolutions per km
- 431.7
- geometric, not measured
- Typical load index
- 82–99
- 1047–1709 lb per tire
A passenger tire's load index tracks its air volume, and volume tracks section width and sidewall height. Sizes in this class sit in the band that carries a typical two-tonne car with its rated payload across four tires.
The load-index range shown is the band this CLASS of size is typically produced in — not a list of what is in stock for this exact size today. Load index and speed symbol are printed on the sidewall of the specific tire you are holding, and the required minimum is on the placard of the specific vehicle you are fitting. Read both.
Nearest real sizes in imperial notation, same wheel
- 32x11.50R1732.00 in tall+2.97 in
- 33x10.50R1733.00 in tall+3.97 in
- 33x12.50R1733.00 in tall+3.97 in
Compare any two sizes, including ones this site has no page for, in the comparison tool.
Platforms recorded with this size
Mid-size crossovers and SUVs in their base wheel specification — Highlander, Pilot, Grand Cherokee, Murano and similar — sit on this size, as do a number of full-size saloons with all-wheel drive.
Five rungs, 0.51 inches apart
| Size | Section | Diameter | Revolutions per mile |
|---|---|---|---|
| 225/65R17 | 8.86 in | 28.52 in | 707.3 |
| 235/65R17 | 9.25 in | 29.03 in | 694.8 |
| 245/65R17 | 9.65 in | 29.54 in | 682.8 |
| 255/65R17 | 10.04 in | 30.05 in | 671.1 |
| 265/65R17 | 10.43 in | 30.56 in | 659.9 |
Every rung is 0.51 in of diameter and 0.39 in of section width, and the whole family spans 2.05 in from bottom to top. This is the longest evenly-spaced run in the catalogue, and it exists because the 17-inch crossover market is deep enough to support five widths at one aspect ratio.
Revolutions per mile falls by roughly twelve per rung, which is the figure the axle ratio is multiplied against to give engine speed. Four rungs of width take the count down by nearly fifty revolutions per mile — a 7.18% change in diameter — which is far from trivial in gearing terms. A vehicle calibrated for the bottom rung and fitted with the top one would show an indicated 70 mph at an actual 75.0 mph.
Closest match, one wheel size up
235/60R18 measures 29.10 in — 0.26% away, on the same 9.25 in section. That is the plus-one counterpart of this size, and the two run in parallel across whole model ranges.
235/75R15 is closer still at 28.88 in, 0.52% below, with 6.94 in of sidewall on a 15-inch wheel. It is the same nominal tread on a fifteen-year-older wheel package.
Six inches of casing on a 17-inch wheel
6.01 in is more casing than any passenger-class 17-inch size below it in the table carries, and it is what keeps a heavy crossover comfortable on a comparatively small wheel. It also means the loaded rolling radius differs from the free radius computed here by more than a low-profile size would — the overall diameter and rolling radius reference sets out why.
Related
- 225/65R17 vs 235/65R17
- 235/65R17 vs 245/65R17
- 32x11.50R1732.00 in tall
- 33x10.50R1733.00 in tall
- 33x12.50R1733.00 in tall
Class: Passenger touring. Every figure above is computed from the size code, not stored — see how these numbers are calculated.