275/60R20 — a 33-inch tire that does not say so
One hundredth of an inch separates this size from the flotation tire people upgrade to. The width does not.
Metric notation · Crossover and SUV
- Overall diameter
- 32.99 in
- 838 mm
- Section width
- 10.83 in
- 275 mm
- Sidewall height
- 6.50 in
- 165 mm
- Aspect ratio
- 60%
- sidewall as a share of width
- Wheel diameter
- 20 in
- the hole in the middle
- Circumference
- 103.6 in
- 2633 mm
- Revolutions per mile
- 611.3
- geometric, not measured
- Revolutions per km
- 379.8
- geometric, not measured
- Typical load index
- 98–116
- 1653–2756 lb per tire
Crossovers are heavier than the cars they share size families with, so the same nominal size is produced at a higher index for SUV fitment than for passenger fitment. Two tires wearing the same size code can carry materially different loads.
The load-index range shown is the band this CLASS of size is typically produced in — not a list of what is in stock for this exact size today. Load index and speed symbol are printed on the sidewall of the specific tire you are holding, and the required minimum is on the placard of the specific vehicle you are fitting. Read both.
Nearest real sizes in imperial notation, same wheel
- 33x12.50R2033.00 in tall+0.01 in
- 35x12.50R2035.00 in tall+2.01 in
- 37x12.50R2037.00 in tall+4.01 in
Compare any two sizes, including ones this site has no page for, in the comparison tool.
Five trucks already leave the factory on this
Five vehicle records name 275/60R20 as factory equipment — four full-size pickups from three manufacturers and one full-size SUV, all on a 20-inch wheel. The panel above has them. In the only sense the arithmetic recognises, every one of those trucks is delivered on 33-inch tires.
Two codes, one height, one sidewall
Set it against 33x12.50R20 and the correspondence is closer than the "is a 285 really a 33" argument ever gets:
| 275/60R20 | 33x12.50R20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overall diameter | 32.99 in | 33.00 in |
| Sidewall height | 6.50 in | 6.50 in |
| Section width | 10.83 in | 12.50 in |
| Aspect ratio | 60 | 52 |
| Revolutions per mile | 611.3 | 611.2 |
The height difference is 0.01 in — 0.02%, or one part in five thousand. At an indicated 70 mph the actual speed is 70.0 mph. Over 100 indicated miles the true distance is 100.0. There is no measurable consequence of any kind, and a real tire's mould tolerance is an order of magnitude larger than the gap.
The sidewalls match to the hundredth as well: 275 mm at 60% is 165 mm, which is 6.50 in, and a 33 on a 20-inch wheel has 13 in of tire above and below the rim, which is also 6.50 in per side.
What is actually different, and why the aspect ratios disagree
One dimension separates them: 1.67 in of section width.
That single difference is also why the two codes report different aspect ratios for tires with identical sidewalls. Aspect ratio is sidewall expressed as a percentage of section width, so the same 6.50 in of sidewall is 60% of a 275 mm casing and 52% of a 12.50 in one. The 33's aspect ratio is not printed anywhere on it, and if it were, the number would look like a low-profile tire's.
This is the clearest available demonstration that aspect ratio describes a shape, not a height. Two tires can share a sidewall to the hundredth of an inch and be eight aspect points apart.
Every one of those five trucks lists the flotation 33 as an upgrade
That is not an exaggeration of the records: the F-150, Silverado, Sierra, Ram and Tahoe all name 33x12.50R20 among their common upgrades while shipping 275/60R20 from the factory.
The step is 0.01 in of height and 1.67 in of width. Nothing about the speedometer, the odometer, the axle ratio or the engine speed at a given road speed changes. What changes is section width, which is the dimension none of the arithmetic on this site can see and the only one that is actually moving.
The steps that do change something
| Target | Diameter | Change | Speed at an indicated 70 mph |
|---|---|---|---|
| 275/55R20 | 31.91 in | −1.08 in (3.28%) | 67.7 mph |
| 285/60R20 | 33.46 in | +0.47 in | 71.0 mph |
| 275/65R20 | 34.07 in | +1.08 in (3.28%) | 72.3 mph |
| 285/65R20 | 34.59 in | +1.59 in (4.83%) | 73.4 mph |
| 35x12.50R20 | 35.00 in | +2.01 in | — |
Note the symmetry in rows one and three: five aspect points down and five aspect points up are both 1.08 in on a 275 casing, for the same reason five points on a 265 is always 1.04 in. The percentage is applied to a section width that is not changing.
One more sits between the rows and is easy to miss: 305/55R20 at 33.21 in. It is only 0.22 in taller than this size, and 1.18 in wider — a third route to a wider tire that costs almost nothing in diameter, and therefore nothing in speedometer error either. Where 33x12.50R20 adds width at 0.01 in of height, this one adds slightly less width for slightly more height.
How long it takes for a hundredth of an inch to matter
It is worth putting a number on "no measurable consequence", because 0.01 in is not zero and the error does accumulate.
Drive 10,000 indicated miles on 33x12.50R20 after leaving the factory on this size and the true distance is 10,002 miles. Drive 100,000 and it is 100,024. Twenty-four miles, over a distance most of these trucks will not reach.
Set that against the same trucks' other listed upgrade. 285/65R20 is 4.83% taller, and 100,000 indicated miles on it is 104,833 — a discrepancy of nearly five thousand miles, arriving from a step that looks, in the option list, like the same kind of decision as the flotation 33.
Downward, 265/60R20 is 0.47 in shorter at 1.43%. That is the smallest real change available on this wheel, and it is still large enough to see on a trip meter over a single tank.
Related
- 275/60R20 vs 35x12.50R20
- 275/60R20 vs 33x12.50R20
- 275/60R20 vs 285/65R20
- 275/55R20 vs 275/60R20
- 33x12.50R2033.00 in tall
- 35x12.50R2035.00 in tall
- 37x12.50R2037.00 in tall
Class: Crossover and SUV. Every figure above is computed from the size code, not stored — see how these numbers are calculated.